The ark of the covenant

Laisser un commentaire

The ark of the covenant was a capacitor according to Tesla. 

Its description and how to make one is in the bible. 

It was said to communicate with God or serve as a machine to help Moses talk to God.

Why? Because as a capacitor in a particulary highly electrified magnetosphere being the castastrophies, linked to the planet Venus is it near approach of the earth, it would create highly negative ion charge, which would increase ten fold if brought on the top of the mountain ( as Moses did) and where he talked with God, using the ark of the covenant, the link between heaven and earth. This would bring thunderbolts to hit the capacitor/ark of the covenant. maybe if you put something in it, theyre might be alchemical transformation (into jewel or stone) as mentioned with the two tablets of the Ten commandments. 

The Ark of the Covenant is, perhaps, the most famous lost artifact of all time. According to biblical accounts, it contained the Ten Commandments and was used by Moses to communicate directly with God.(1)

Nikola Tesla’s Speculations on the Ark of the Covenant

For centuries, the Ark was viewed as a mystical object from God, beyond the knowledge of man. However, that changed on September 9, 1915, when the famous scientist Nikola Tesla published an article entitled The Wonder World to be Created by Electricity. In it, he made the following astounding claim:

…Moses was undoubtedly a practical and skillful electrician far in advance of his time. The Bible describes precisely and minutely arrangements constituting a machine in which electricity was generated by friction of air against silk curtains and stored in a box constructed like a condenser. It is very plausible to assume that the sons of Aaron were killed by a high tension discharge…(1)

The term condenser is an older word for what we now know as a capacitor, or an electrical machine capable of storing energy. Tesla thought that the Ark generated static electricity by causing air to rub against curtains. This created static electricity which was then stored inside the Ark, turning the box into a giant Leyden Jar.

The Secret of the Ark of the Covenant?

According to Michael Blackburn and Mark Bennett, the true secret lies within the Tabernacle (in the picture below, the Ark is in the foreground while the Tabernacle is being constructed in the background). The Tabernacle was a roofless, three-walled wooden structure. It was closed off with curtains made of different materials, including goat’s hair and rams’ skins. These curtains rubbed against each other, creating an initial static charge. As this charge built up, the entire structure along with the Ark became highly electrified. At full tilt, Blackburn and Bennett estimate that the Ark would’ve been capable of carrying a charge in the range of fifty thousands volts.(1)

According to the Bible, the waters of the River Jordan parted before the Ark. Also, after being captured by the Philistines, they suffered boils, tumors, and other plagues which they attributed to the Ark. In addition, the Ark was instrumental in bringing down the walls of Jericho, acting as a sort of ancient weapon of mass destruction.

1. http://www.guerrillaexplorer.com/strange-science/ark-of-the-covenant-lost-technology/

The cult of Yahweh

Laisser un commentaire

The cult of Yahweh is but the cult of Venus, the comet that created havoc on earth in the approximate year of 1500 B.C. according to Velikovsky’s findings.

 

This is probably the origin of the cult of Akhenaton: the cult of Aton. 

This is my hypothesis that Akhenaton is not worshipping monotheism, as either was Moses, coincidently being the same person. 

 

The exode of the king which kingdom has been destroyed by the 10 plagues of Egypt and force him to flee and roam through the desert. 

They bring with them the ark of the alliance which they might not understand what it does or how it works, or maybe they do. Might have been a device set on top of pyramid, would be logic to put it there being a capacitor, at the high end of the pyramid, very electrically charged. Great catalyzer of negative ions which would bring rain, thunder and thunderbolts.

Satan and Lucifer are also the same as Venus, but must be more akin to the tail or the serpent or dragon, the fiery tail of plasa reaching out from the comet Venus and its array of electric discharges unto our planets magnetosphere. Looked like a battle between two super natural forces. 

Aton Adunai Adonis

Laisser un commentaire

Some rabbis asserted that a person who pronounces YHVH according to its letters (instead of using a substitute) has no place in the World to Come, and should be put to death. Instead of pronouncing the four-letter Name, we usually substitute the Name « Adonai, » or simply say « Ha-Shem » (lit. The Name). (1)

  • The Ancient Name of God: The Hebrew name for God, YHWH (in Hebrew spelled yud-hay-vav-hay), is never pronounced out loud in Judaism. When it appears in Jewish scripture or liturgy, the reader substitutes the Hebrew word « adonai » which means « my lord » or often just « the Lord. »(2)
  • Adonai: Among many traditional Jews even the word « adonai » is not spoken outside of prayer services. Because « adonai » is so closely linked to the name of God, over time it has been accorded more and more reverence as well. Outside of prayer services, traditional Jews will replace « adonai » with « HaShem » meaning « the Name » or some other way of referring to God without using « adonai. » (2)

ADON

In Ancient Semitic religion, specifically Canaanite religion, the term Adon (ʾdwn, Hebrew אדון, from a triliteral « hollow » root D-I-N or D-W-N, cognate with Akkadian adannu « mighty »[citation needed]), literally « lord, patron », has been in use as a theonym from the Late Bronze Age at least, contrasting with Ba`al « master ».

In Canaanite (Ugaritic) tradition, ʾadn ilm, literally « lord of gods » is an epithet of El, but ʾadn could also be an epithet of other gods, especially Tammuz. The epithet of Tammuz enters Greek tradition as a proper name, Adonis, the youthful lover of Aphrodite.

Hebrew tradition makes Adon « lord » or Adonai « my lord » an epithet of the God of Israel, depicted as the chief antagonist of « the Ba`als » in the Tanakh. The epithet came to be used as an euphemism to avoid invoking the deity’s proper name, Yahweh.

Adonis is a « Semitic divine title equipped with a Greek ending » derived from adon; by the time of Sappho, a cult worshiping Adonis had emerged in Ancient Greece.[1]

In Ugaritic texts, ʾdn in its meaning as « lord » appears a number of times. Used to refer to the lord and father over deceased kings, the term ʾadn ʾilm rbm (meaning « the Lord of the Great Gods »),[2] is thought by some scholars[who?] to be a divine epiteph of Ba`al,[dubious – discuss] while others think it refers to El, Mardikh, Yaqar or Yarikh.[3][4] ʾAdn ʾilm (meaning « the Lord of Gods ») also appears in the texts to refer to El, and when Yam is described in at being at the height of his power, he is proclaimed ʾadn or « lord (of the gods).[4]

Ugarit family households were modeled after the structure of the divine world, each headed by an ʾadn (meaning in this context « master » or « patron »). Generally, this was the patriarch of the family and there may be some relation between ʾadn and the Ugarit word for « father », ʾad.[5(3)

Adonis

The Greek Ἄδωνις (Greek pronunciation: [ˈadɔːnis]), Adōnis was a borrowing from the Semitic word adon, meaning « lord »,[2] which is related to Adonai, one of the names used to refer to the God (אֲדֹנָי) in the Hebrew Bible and still used in Judaismto the present day. Syrian Adonis is Gauas[3] or Aos, akin to Egyptian Osiris, the Semitic Tammuz and Baal Hadad, the Etruscan Atunis and the Phrygian Attis, all of whom are deities of rebirth and vegetation.[4](4)

TAMMUZ

Tammuz (Syriac: ܬܡܘܙ; Hebrew: תַּמּוּז, Transliterated Hebrew: Tammuz, Tiberian Hebrew: Tammûz; Arabic: تمّوز‎ Tammūz; Akkadian: Duʾzu, Dūzu; Sumerian: Dumuzid (DUMU.ZI(D), « faithful or true son« ) was the name of a Sumerian god of food and vegetation, also worshiped in the later Mesopotamian states of Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia

In Babylonia, the month Tammuz was established in honor of the eponymous god Tammuz, who originated as a Sumerian shepherd-god, Dumuzid or Dumuzi, the consort of Inanna and, in his Akkadian form, the parallel consort of Ishtar.

1. http://www.jewfaq.org/name.htm

2. http://judaism.about.com/od/judaismbasics/a/Why-Do-Some-Jews-Spell-God-G-D.htm

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adon

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adonis

Lucifer

Laisser un commentaire

What does the Bible have to say about Lucifer?

Isaiah 14:12-15

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit. (1)

above the stars of God (El/Saturn?)

what / where is Sheol ?

She’ol (/ˈʃiːoʊl/ shee-ohl or /ˈʃiːəl/ shee-əl; Hebrew שְׁאוֹל Šʾôl), translated as « grave », « pit », or « abode of the dead« , is the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible‘s underworld, a place of darkness to which all the dead go, both the righteous and the unrighteous, regardless of the moral choices made in life, a place of stillness and darkness cut off from God.[1]

The inhabitants of Sheol were the « shades » (rephaim), entities without personality or strength.[2] Under some circumstances they could be contacted by the living, as the Witch of Endor contacts the shade of Samuel for Saul, but such practices are forbidden (Deuteronomy 18:10).[3]While the Old Testament writings describe Sheol as the permanent place of the dead, in the Second Temple period (roughly 500 BCE-70 CE) a more diverse set of ideas developed: in some texts, Sheol is the home of both the righteous and the wicked, separated into respective compartments; in others, it was a place of punishment, meant for the wicked dead alone.[4] When the Hebrew scriptures were translated into Greek in ancient Alexandria around 200 BC the word « Hades » (the Greek underworld) was substituted for Sheol, and this is reflected in the New Testament where Hades is both the underworld of the dead and the personification of the evil it represents.[5] (2)

Hades (/ˈheɪdiːz/; from Ancient Greek Ἅιδης/ᾍδης, Hāidēs; Doric Ἀΐδας Aidas) was the ancient Greek god of the underworld. Eventually, the god’s name came to designate the abode of the dead. In Greek mythology, Hades is the oldest male child of Cronus and Rhea considering the order of birth from the mother, or the youngest, considering the regurgitation by the father. The latter view is attested in Poseidon‘s speech in the Iliad.[1] According to myth, he and his brothersZeus and Poseidon defeated the Titans and claimed rulership over the cosmos, ruling the underworld, air, and sea, respectively; the solid earth, long the province of Gaia, was available to all three concurrently.

Later the Greeks started referring to the god as Plouton (see below), which the Romans Latinized as Pluto.[2] The Romans would associate Hades/Pluto with their own chthonic gods, Dis Pater and Orcus. The corresponding Etruscan god wasAita. He is often pictured with the three-headed dog Cerberus. In the later mythological tradition, though not in antiquity, he is associated with the Helm of Darkness and the bident. The term hades in Christian theology (and in New Testament Greek) is parallel to Hebrew sheol (שאול, « grave, dirt-pit »), and refers to the abode of the dead. The Christian concept of hell is more akin to and communicated by the Greek concept of Tartarus, a deep, gloomy part of hades used as a dungeon of torment and suffering. (3)

Revelation 12:7-9

Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back, but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.

Accordingly to Velikovsky ideas, Michael is the planet Venus, as archangel Gabriel is the planet Mars. (citation needed)

Angel

Etymology

The word angel in English is a fusion of the Old English/Germanic word engel (with a hard g) and the Old French angele. Both derive from the Latin angelus which in turn is the romanization of the ancient Greek ἄγγελος (ángelos[5]), « messenger », « envoy »,[6] which is related to the Greek verb ἀγγέλλω (angéllō), meaning « bear a message, announce, bring news of » etc.[7] (4)

 

Judaism

 

Main article: Angels in Judaism

 

The Bible uses the terms מלאך אלהים (mal’āk̠ ’ĕlōhîm; messenger of God), מלאך יהוה (mal’āk̠ YHWH; messenger of the Lord), בני אלהים (bənē Elohim ’ĕlōhîm; sons of God) and הקודשים (haqqôd̠əšîm; the holy ones) to refer to beings traditionally interpreted as angels. Later texts use other terms, such as העליונים (hā‘elyônîm; the upper ones). (4)

2 Corinthians 11:14

And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

Luke 10:18

And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Ezekiel 28:14

You were an anointed guardian cherub. I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; in the midst of the stones of fire you walked.

Holy Mountain of God

2 Peter 2:4

For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment;

Ezekiel 28:16

In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence in your midst, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and I destroyed you, O guardian cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.

Wonder if sinned has something to with the Babylonian moon God, Sin.

1. http://www.openbible.info/topics/lucifer

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheol

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hades

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels

The Hyksos

Laisser un commentaire

Velikovsky suggests an interesting idea about the Hyksos invading egypt during the time of the ten plagues of Egypt. This would give a good reason for Akhenaton to flee or be expelled as king. Hamed Osman, says in the interview mentionned in the article before, that the Talmud states that Moses went South to Ethiopia first and crossed an another lake, instead of the red sea, where moses became king for sometime. This storyline makes sense, but will we be able to associate akhenaton with Moses, when even Velikovsky does not believe it. 

It seemed that the missing Egyptian corroboration had been found. However, such considerations as language style and certain historical references indicated the time of these events to be the collapse of the Egyptian Middle Kingdom, conventionally dated around 500 years before the Exodus, the latter being identified with the expulsion from Egypt of a people referred to as the Hyksos. Velikovsky began to suspect that this equating of the Hyksos with the Hebrews was an error, and the Hyksos were in fact the desert tribe that had invaded Egypt at the time the Middle Kingdom ended and the Hebrews left– and were then driven out themselves at a later date.(1)

Velikovsky’s response was to go with what the weight of evidence seemed to say and concluded that Egyptian history was padded to the extent of making events seem 500 to 800 years further away from the present than they had in fact been. To bring things into line, he proposed moving the end of the Middle Kingdom and invasion by the Hyksos down 500 years to accord with the Hebrew date for the Exodus of around 1450 B.C. (1)

Now we have to find the name of the Pharaoh that was invaded by the Hyksos, who invaded the egyptian land during the exodus, according to velikovsky. Velikovsky associates the Pharaoh Tutimaios to the Pharaoh of the period of the Exodus, although the exil has already happened at this time, so Tutimaios would not be Akhenaton, but the ruler that has stayed in place. The hyksos take advantage of the chaos of the destruction to pillage and kill people so as to survive probably.

Josephus Flavious quoting passages from Manethos

« Tutimaeus. In his reign, for what cause I know not, a blast of God smote us; and unexpectedly, from the regions of the East, invaders of obscure race marched in confidence of victory against our land. By main force they easily overpowered the rulers of the land, they burned our cities ruthlessly, razed to the ground the temples of the gods, and treated all the natives with cruel hostility, massacring some and leading into slavery the wives and children of others. Finally, they appointed as king one of their number whose name was Salitis.  » (2)

This looks like Tutimaeus could come from toum or Atum/Atom, closer to Atom, but I stretch that point, so nothing is sure.

Where does Velikovsky’s « King Thom » fit in? In Worlds in Collision (p. 88) he was « Taoui-Thom »; in Ages in Chaos, « Thom » or « Thoum ». None of these spellings appears in either translation. Griffith’s « Tum » is Goyon’s « Toum’ (pronounced the same). The insertion of an « h » accentuates its similarity to the « Pithom » of Exodus. And Taoui? « In Ages in Chaos, » wrote Velikovsky, « evidence will be presented to identify the pharaoh of the Exodus as Taoui Thom, the last king of the Middle Kingdom. He is Tau Timaeus (Tutimaeus) of Manetho… The name of his queen is given in the naos of el-Arish as Tephnut. » 22

Actually, « Taoui » is not part of this name at all: « Hy-taoui » is the name of the royal palace of the XIIth Dynasty, south of Memphis, as Goyon explains in a note. Velikovsky joined these two unrelated elements with a hyphen and created another form, « Tau Timaeus, » intermediate between this combination and Manetho’s « Tutimaeus ». Velikovsky must have had another look at the text before releasing Ages in Chaos, as in that book we find only the forms « Thom » and « Thoum ».

But Tum is merely a variant form of Atum: Tum, Atum, and Ra are used interchangeably in the text. At the very beginning of his translation, Goyon notes that « in the continuation of the narrative, the first king of the universe is sometimes Ra, sometimes Toum. » (3)

This also is of great importance:

Pharaohs in the book of Exodus

The book of Exodus tells how the Israelites are enslaved in Egypt and eventually escape under the leadership of Moses. At least two pharaohs are involved, the « pharaoh of the oppression » who enslaves the Israelites, and the « pharaoh of the exodus« , during whose rule the Israelites escape. The biblical story does not name either, nor does it give enough information to identify the period in which the events are set, with the result that there have been many suggestions as to which of Egypt’s many rulers was involved. (4)

ever I cannot prove this.

1. http://www.jamesphogan.com/books/info.php?titleID=37&cmd=sample&sample=79

2. http://ezinearticles.com/?Tutimaios-The-Pharaoh-Who-Lost-A-Country&id=804899

3. http://www.pibburns.com/smelaris.htm

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharaohs_in_the_Bible#Pharaohs_in_the_book_of_Exodus

Moses and Akhenaton

Laisser un commentaire

After trying to find a link between Akhenaton and Abraham, I paralleled ideas in my research where Akhenaton was compared to Moses, such a Freud explained in his last book.

This, Velikovsky tried to argue that Freud was wrong, in his book Oedipe and Akhenaton. If Velikovsky is right, that there is a correlation between Akhenaton and Oedipe, does it invalidate the claim that Moses is Akhenaton? I dont have that answer yet.

But similarities between Akhenaton and Moses are very interesting. Thus, if Moses is Akhenaton, we have to find informations that conveys the idea that the Exodus, the time of great destruction and calamity as set in the Bible, happened during the reign of Akhenaton or in that time period.

It is of interest to know that the reign of Akhenamon, which becomes Akhenaton because of his new worship of Aton. Scholars link Aton to the worship of the Sun. But why this new worship of the sun? If Akhenaton was living during the period of the Exodus, he then must have seen of his eyes the origin of the catastrophies of the Exodus, which were caused by the proto-planet/ at the time comet that we call today Venus, according to Velikovsky’s theories.

Akhenaton would have venerated the fleeting star in the sky, Venus, that shone in the night and the day. It would explain the new cult. The destruction brought by Venus at the time of Exodus, would have maybe made the people thing they were cursed, as is seen in the Bible, its a curse to the Egyptian. It brought destruction and death. He might have been expelled from his land because of his worship of this destructive god.

Only thing is that Horus is also Venus, so … Who came first, Horus or Venus in their timeline, why would they have different names?

Michael Tsarion in an interview at Red Ice radio, says that the cult of Aton is the worship of the Sun, but also compares the worship of Aton to the worship of Lucifer, the enlightned one. Michael Tsarions theory is that the Illuminati come from the jewish worship of Aton, brought to them from Akhenaton alias Moses. (1)

Ahmed Osman also wrote a book about Akhenaton and Moses. The thrid part is the most interesting. (2)

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJfk5C8Y84M

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6_vbEfXG6I

The Universality of the story of the Tower of Babel

Laisser un commentaire

The Tower of Babel story was found in the most remote parts of the world prior to the arrival of missionaries in those places, thus before the Biblical account became known to the aborigines.

For instance, on the island of Hao, part of the Puamotu (or Tuamotu) islands in Polynesia, the people used to tell that after a great flood the sons of Rata, who survived, made an attempt to erect a building by which they could reach the sky and see the creator god Vatea (or Atea). “But the god in anger chased the builders away, broke down the building, and changed their language, so that they spoke divers tongues.” (11)

The question of Biblical influence was discussed by the folklorist: “They [the natives of Hao] declared that this tradition existed already with their ancestors, before the arrival of the Europeans. I leave to them the responsibility for this declaration. All I can certify is that this tradition contains many ancient words which today are no longer understood by the natives.” (1)

 

1. http://www.varchive.org/itb/confus.htm